|
For some time now, I’m not
exactly sure how long, it has been accepted by the members
of the Conway Veterans Association that the USS CONWAY was
sunk as a target vessel in 1970. For many members of the
Association this apparent ignomeous end was unsettling. Any
sailor who has served on a United States Naval ship feels as
though they are a part of that ship. It is as though flesh
and blood have become infused into gray steel. It is
difficult to hear that your ship has been stricken
from the Naval Vessel Register and then disposed of
as a Naval asset. In our eyes our ship being used as a
target deminishes her heroic service to our nation.
New information has come to
light about the sinking of CONWAY. The USS HENLEY (DD-762)
is the destroyer that sunk the CONWAY. The crew of the
HENLEY has heard and read stories of how HENLEY sunk CONWAY
as a target vessel. The HENLEY crew has not felt good about
having this distinction. Through the diligent research of
our brother sailors of the USS HENLEY Association we can now
know exactly how the CONWAY was sunk. The following
information comes from Richard Douglas, editor of the HENLEY
Association newsletter “ The Steamer”. The story is
reprinted from Richard Douglas’s letter to the USS CONWAY
VETERANS ASSOCIATION dated 3 July 2008. This is what he
says of the incident.
“I made a plea for anyone
aboard HENLEY at the time she sunk CONWAY to come forth. A
few weeks later I received a telephone call from the one
person who could best know the true story – the C/O of the
HENLEY during the incident, Captain Tom Vojtek. He had an
interesting story to relate, and one that contradicted the
previously reported story that HENLEY sunk CONWAY as a “target”.
Captain Vojtek recalls, ‘We
were on a reserve training cruise, June 1970. It was a
foggy morning. I received a dispatch that a destroyer under
tow had broken loose from a sea-going tug.. It was too
dangerous to re-attach the cable and the drifting tin can
represented a hazard to shipping. The order was to sink the
CONWAY. We had to get close enough to make sure we had the
right ship and that nobody was on board. We were able to
get the job done safely, sinking the USS CONWAY with 5 inch
gunfire’.
LTjg. Jim Claxton, was
operations officer aboard HENLEY, June 1970. Because he was
hospitalized for an injury, he was not on board at the time
of the sinking of CONWAY. Jim lives near Washington D.C.
He offered to see what more he could learn by gaining access
to the National Archives. His report follows. The deck log
information, being in Navy jargon, may not be very
understandable to those of us not regular around the bridge.
‘I spent awhile yesterday at
the National Archives. It was very interesting. Within two
hours the clerks had pulled the original deck logs for the
HENLEY for 1970. When I opened the logs for the month of
June, I saw that I had the in port watch on 1 June. Kind of
an awesome feeling to see your own signature on something
held in the National Archives!’
DECK LOG:
The ship got u/w on 15 June 1970 with ResCrew o/b IAW
CRDD5ND OPORD. Bloodsworth Is. On 18 June; Newport on 19
June; VACAPES on 24 June. NGFS exercises, highline and
line transfers, brief anchorages at Lynhaven Anchorage.
(The only entry possibly relevent to the question at hand
was on 26 June.) On Friday, 26 June, “1417, arrived vic
SINKEX. 1449 SINKEX completed with no need of our
assistance”. John J. Beall Jr, LT USNR-R signed the entry
for that watch. (There was no mention of why the ship was
there, not any geoloc on the event). 27 June, moored port
side to USS DAMATO (DD-871) at D&S piers”.
There is a call to the
members of the HENLEY Association by the editor of “The
Steamer” for any other crew members who might have been on
board at that time to come forward with additional
verification of the story. Recollections of HENLEY Captain
Vojtek and the research of Operations officer Jim Claxton
indicate that we all now know what the fate of CONWAY was.”
Captain Tom Vojtek,
Operations officer Jim Claxton, Steamer Editor Richard
Douglas
There are still many
unanswered questions that will require more thorough
investigation. Editor of “The Steamer” Richard Douglas
asks, “Where were the other destroyers in their division?
How many shots were fired? How long did it take CONWAY to
sink? Where did the false target story come from?”
Questions I have are, Where was CONWAY being towed to and
for what purpose? Was there time to remove the ship’s
bell? I have a feeling that there will be a list of
questions for us to pursue.
A
portion of my response to
Richard Douglas of HENLEY is as follows: “This information
you have given us will be shared with our crew. It is never
a good feeling, as well you know, to lose a ship that has
meant so much to so many people. For me I now feel that the
CONWAY went down not as simply a target, but that
she gave herself up so that she would not
endanger others. Please pass this information on to Captain
Vojtek, Operations Officer Jim Claxton and the rest of your
crew members.”
Tom Keane
Co-Historian
Conway Veterans Association |